- #MICROSOFT OFFICE FOR MAC REVIEWS FOR MAC#
- #MICROSOFT OFFICE FOR MAC REVIEWS UPGRADE#
- #MICROSOFT OFFICE FOR MAC REVIEWS PC#
- #MICROSOFT OFFICE FOR MAC REVIEWS WINDOWS#
I'm genuinely curious if you've ever built anything nearly as complex as productivity software. And I paid $200 for this bullshit!? That's what makes me LIVID. These are supposed to be "professional" apps, and they were hacked together by goddamn amateurs.
#MICROSOFT OFFICE FOR MAC REVIEWS FOR MAC#
I swear if I ever meet the team that coded the 2011 Office for Mac apps, I will kick them in the nuts/uterus repeatedly until they are infertile so that they, and their offspring can never reproduce such shitty code again.įucking hell. Nevertheless, if the rumors are to be believed, an updated version of Office for Mac is right around the corner. This is why you see an updated Office version already on the iPhone and iPad, but not yet on the Mac.
#MICROSOFT OFFICE FOR MAC REVIEWS PC#
Macs still account for less than 10% of the PC market, and that number is flat as iDevices have soared.
#MICROSOFT OFFICE FOR MAC REVIEWS WINDOWS#
This one is a guess, though, so take it with a grain of salt.Īnd finally, consider that to Microsoft, supporting OSX is like an iOS developer supporting Windows Phone - there just isn't much ROI there. Do you think Microsoft got advanced issues of the next MacBook line to test on from Apple? Unlikely.Īgain, consider that the most common version of MB and MBP and indeed all MBA's at the time were the ones with integrated graphics only, or legacy versions with pretty wimpy video graphics.Īlso, consider that OpenCL may not have supported many of the features that Office could have used for this kind of GPU utilization in the version of OSX that was out at the time. Very hard to develop an application against technology that doesn't exist or isn't widely adopted yet.
![microsoft office for mac reviews microsoft office for mac reviews](https://images.macworld.co.uk/cmsdata/reviews/3612554/word2.jpg)
NVidia Optimus and AMD Switchable Graphics) was not around that long before Office 2011 released in October 2010. If you're saying that the integrated graphics are used exclusively, and never the discrete graphics, consider that graphics switching (e.g. If the GPU did not render anything, you would be looking at a blank screen, or your wallpaper. I'm really not sure what you're talking about on this one. So, graphs with 50,000+ data points take 30 seconds to 5 MINUTES to load. The GPU does NO work in the mac version of Excel or Powerpoint. In 2010, when Office 2011 was released, the vast majority of Macs were only dual-core, most without hyperthreading. Yeah, it usually doesn't work out well when you hold people of the past accountable for the standards of today. This subreddit is not endorsed or sponsored by Apple Inc. If you'd like to view their content together, click here. This fundamental difference in audience is why we support two communities, r/Apple and r/AppleHelp. Apple SubredditsĬontent which benefits the community (news, rumors, and discussions) is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, etc.).
#MICROSOFT OFFICE FOR MAC REVIEWS UPGRADE#
Not sure what to buy?Īsk in our Daily Advice Thread or in our dedicated sister sub /r/AppleWhatShouldIBuy! See also the iPhone Upgrade Wiki for more information.
![microsoft office for mac reviews microsoft office for mac reviews](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/reviews/03bB3uVy777JAcn4AxkGMev-1..v1569469934.jpg)
The proper place for advice is /r/AppleWhatShouldIBuy.
![microsoft office for mac reviews microsoft office for mac reviews](https://cdn.eteknix.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Microsoft-Office-Mac-1.jpg)